No. 19-5549
Anthony Dion Collins v. Francisco Lara, Warden
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: constitutional-law criminal-procedure due-process fundamental-defect habeas-corpus judicial-review saving-clause sentencing sentencing-error statutory-maximum
Key Terms:
DueProcess HabeasCorpus
DueProcess HabeasCorpus
Latest Conference:
2019-10-01
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether a fundamental defect is sufficient to satisfy the saving clause where petitioner's erroneous sentence fell beneath the statutory maximum?
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTION(S) PRESENTED I. WHETHER A FUNDAMENTAL DEFECT IS SUFFICIENT TO SATISFY THE SAVING CLAUSE WHERE PETITIONER ERRONEOUS SENTENCE FELL BENEATH THE STATUTORY MAXIMUM? :
Docket Entries
2019-10-07
Petition DENIED.
2019-08-22
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/1/2019.
2019-08-15
Waiver of right of respondent Francisco Lara, Warden to respond filed.
2019-07-15
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due September 9, 2019)
Attorneys
Anthony Dion Collins
Anthony Dion Collins — Petitioner
Francisco Lara, Warden
Noel J. Francisco — Solicitor General, Respondent