No. 19-5550
Jackie Duncan v. United States
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: 10th-circuit abuse-of-discretion civil-procedure constitutional-vagueness due-process evidence-admissibility federal-courts federal-jurisdiction federal-rules-of-evidence judicial-discretion procedural-error rule-403 rule-404(b) rule-404b standard-of-review
Key Terms:
DueProcess
DueProcess
Latest Conference:
2019-10-01
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the 10th Circuit erred in ruling the Western District of Oklahoma didn't abuse their discretion?
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTION(S) PRESENTED 1. WHETHER THE 10TH CIRCUIT ERRED IN RULING THE. WESTERN DISTRICT OF OKLAHOMA DIDN'T ABUSE THEIR DISCRETION? 2. WHETHER ANTHONY JOHNSON. TESTIMONY. OUT WEIGH IT'S PROBATIVE VALUE UNDER THE 403 BALANCE TEST? 3. WHETHER 404(B) IS UNCONSTITUTIONAL VAGUE? ,
Docket Entries
2019-10-07
Petition DENIED.
2019-08-22
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/1/2019.
2019-08-16
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2019-07-15
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due September 9, 2019)
2019-05-30
Application (18A1234) granted by Justice Sotomayor extending the time to file until August 9, 2019.
2019-05-20
Application (18A1234) to extend the time to file a petition for a writ of certiorari from June 10, 2019 to August 9, 2019, submitted to Justice Sotomayor.
Attorneys
United States
Noel J. Francisco — Solicitor General, Respondent
Noel J. Francisco — Solicitor General, Respondent