No. 19-5555
Reginald Lacey v. David Gomez, Warden
IFP
Tags: 4th-amendment civil-rights constitutional-rights due-process fourth-amendment law-enforcement search-and-seizure statutory-authority unreasonable-search void-order warrant-validity warrantless-search
Key Terms:
Environmental Securities Immigration
Environmental Securities Immigration
Latest Conference:
2019-10-11
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the police department's use of a 'void order' to conduct a warrantless search violated the petitioner's Fourth Amendment rights
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
No question identified. : | Question (3) Presenter — eperificaillys Crmeage Police: Department | 4. JAA4 1A0eS, which Was used ta accest the : Rebbioner Wa? Created and issued withatr any Statutory cuthocitys it 1s a! Void Order’ and ib Violated Wis rights ouacanteed by Aye Y.5Constitution Nth ¢ HA Amendments, : Which guarantee crhitens the right to be, | Sree From unreasonable Searches and Spytures= a
Docket Entries
2019-10-15
Petition DENIED.
2019-09-26
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/11/2019.
2019-07-23
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due September 11, 2019)