No. 19-5557

Josiah English, III v. Theodore Campagnolo, Individually and in His Official Capacity as Judge of the Maricopa County Superior Court, et al.

Lower Court: Ninth Circuit
Docketed: 2019-08-12
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: civil-rights constitutional-violations due-process extraordinary-circumstances federal-jurisdiction irreparable-harm ninth-circuit standing state-officials younger-abstention
Key Terms:
AdministrativeLaw
Latest Conference: 2019-10-11
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Did the U.S. District Court err in invoking the Younger Abstention Doctrine and not allowing the Plaintiff to state a claim in his Civil Rights action, in view of the extraordinary circumstances and irreparable loss presented to the U.S. District Court by Plaintiff, as exceptions to the Younger Abstention Doctrine?

Question Presented (from Petition)

QUESTION(S) PRESENTED , | . ‘ pizer : ai DiRThe US. Diftrict Court err 69 én vokiag hE a Yonge A&bterbhon Doctrine arb not qo win ge (re Se Plaintitf DaSish English TIL to State 4 claim in Ais CMA Rights . actlen, jp view of T4e extracrhinafY Circeryfances dnl irreparable /OSS presented t The VS. istrict Court by Pla int iff, as exceptions fo tae Younger AbSteation Doctrine ® fa] DidThe us Cincsit Court of Appeals. ere by affirming TA oo US. pistrich Court 3 50a Sport LiSmissal of Phintiffs Civil Right§ Complrint, bstthoot Wen acKnowl edging or cons/Aeringany of the VXtraordinary Circomspances , inclodeing irreparable /o55, that Plaint fF artivlRor pe fo WSCirceit Court of Appoalf, 48 exceptionS 7? fae Youngar Abstention Doctrine Under Younger Ve Harvis yA Yol U.S. 37 C971) (Supreme Court of The United Stirs) ¢ . [3] Did the US. Circert Court of Appeals err, by net ata oo Pinimer, Allowing Plaintiff Dosfah LS ts SAte | | A Claim ank— priced against thase Defendant Named ih ~ the civil Rights Complaint in which Plaint (FF is Seek in benefary Aamagos against, iho ho not enjoy absdofe [mmua ity x ’ > vetention for abtaining-evidence, of identify ingpysical chacactersticS , [4] aS Acizona Revised Jtatute 13-3905 unconstitutional in Violation of Const fufiona| paramefers est a blishcad Unda The UL. Conptitution, on iS Pace, and Plagrantly and pateatly Vilapive of express con tjfutiongl Prohibitions In every Clase, Sentence, | andy para g.04 ph Ank in whof ver manne nd against whom wert an uffoct might bu make to apply it. 2? | atJen v. Buck 3/3 U5. 387 Yor 6 Ref HA 367 FS L. ER. 141 a1) Supreme Court o Aw United. fh a Particolarly the Y*% and_ld ™ Amudmeatt fe TKe United fq Conpty tution | a _| | | | | | ED

Docket Entries

2019-10-15
Petition DENIED.
2019-09-26
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/11/2019.
2019-09-04
Waiver of right of respondents William G. Montgomery, et al. to respond filed.
2019-07-23
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due September 11, 2019)

Attorneys

Josiah English
Josiah English III — Petitioner
Josiah English III — Petitioner
William G. Montgomery, et al.
Joseph I. VigilMaricopa County Attorney's Office, Respondent
Joseph I. VigilMaricopa County Attorney's Office, Respondent