Whether the defendants' deliberate indifference to the petitioner's serious medical needs violated the Eighth Amendment

No question identified. : | \UESTION G) PRESENTED Petition For Weit Wf Certisraci: Foe adju dication onthe mecits, And Sudgment By this Gut far Mane-bary Damage 3,000,000 _ _Pbibioned addresses this honaruble Superme. Court withaconuise __ statement of this case. contatini ng the {Mates ial tacks to the co nsidecation — _of the questions relevant facks presented, was the defendonts conduct _de\ therately ,Pucposely Knowing nd cbjecluely lyu teresa’ in Respect to Vv ialating Johnson rcHottonal Vio S Fourteen 1 Amendment GQ nd fal ath Jnendiment These merits inthis. cose hasnst been deci ded “pain the lautee Courts, Therelives I Respedfully ask tis curt to Pens, take these merits and Material Cacks in consideration to decidech Lis Casedor a Goal decision. | Ei cot i restion| “las the defendants _deliberat be indifference to Johnson serious medical neecl s aa [Second Queskion| “Did the “Ord the defendnts Subiect Johnsen toa form OF putishment bn yng. lockcupunitshiatoe bis an lack-up foe tbehaviac Problems inte. facili Rather} Ow put. Srhnonin amedical unit foe his conditions? | Thir tio ond dbjecively Unrencandole 2” Fes uth Q restion “Did fre, ASenclanks Violecke.s hasan Constitutional Right Fourteenth