Whether the lower courts erred in denying the petitioner due process by prohibiting him from proving his actual innocence

QUESTION(S) PRESENTED 1. THIS IS AN EXCEPTIONAL CASE. THE PETITIONER WAS CONVICTED OF MURDER IN CHESTER COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA. {This™~incident evolved from a drug deal gone bad, in Chester County, Pa-). THE MURDER WAS CONFESSED TO BY DARYL GLASCO, WHO STATED HE DID ACT ALONE AND THAT HE WAS ALONE WHEN HE SHOT AND KILLED BOTH i OF THE BROWN REQUESTED THE COMMONWEALTH PROVIDE FOR A DNA TEST/ANALYSIS ON EXCULPATORY EVIDENCE THAT WOULD PROVE HIS INNOCENCE. THE COMMONWEALTH DENIED THE MOTION _ ‘AND THE APPELLATE COURTS REFUSED TO GRANT RELIEF ON APPEAL. THE LOWER COURTS DID ERROR AND DENIED THE PETITIONER DUE PROCESS (5TH & 14TH AMENDMENT) PROHIBITING THE PETITIONER-TO PROVE-THAT HE IS ACTUALLY INNOCENT. [iii] : "