No. 19-5588
Luis Ordonez-Vega v. United States
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: appeal appellate-counsel civil-rights conflict-of-interest criminal-procedure due-process inadequate-representation-of-counsel ineffective-assistance ineffective-assistance-of-counsel merit-review section-2255 waive waiver
Key Terms:
DueProcess HabeasCorpus
DueProcess HabeasCorpus
Latest Conference:
2019-10-01
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Did conflict of interest arise when appellate counsel's failed to raise non-frivolous merit(s) 'ineffective assistance of counsel' on defendant's first appeal 'waive' his ability to later raise certain issue(s) in a sect. 2255 motion constituted inadequate representation of counsel
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTION(S) PRESENTED . DID CONFLICT OF INTEREST ARISE WHEN APPELLATE COUNSEL'S FAILED TO RAISE NON-FRIVOLOUS MERIT(S) "INEFFECTIVE ASSISTANCE OF COUNSEL" ON DEFENDANT'S FIRST APPEAL "WAIVE" HIS ABILITY TO LATER RAISE CERTAIN ISSUE(S) IN A SECT. 2255 MOTION CONSTITUTED INADEQUATE REPRESENTATION OF COUNSEL
Docket Entries
2019-10-07
Petition DENIED.
2019-08-29
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/1/2019.
2019-08-23
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2019-08-01
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due September 13, 2019)
Attorneys
United States
Noel J. Francisco — Solicitor General, Respondent
Noel J. Francisco — Solicitor General, Respondent