No. 19-5589

Marlon Leroy Porch v. T. Watson, Warden

Lower Court: Fifth Circuit
Docketed: 2019-08-14
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: criminal-procedure fundamental-defect maximum-sentence saving-clause sentence-review sentencing sentencing-enhancement statutory-interpretation statutory-maximum
Key Terms:
DueProcess HabeasCorpus
Latest Conference: 2019-10-01
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether a fundamental defect is sufficient to satisfy the saving clause where petitioner's erroneous sentence fell beneath the statutory maximum

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

QUESTION(S) PRESENTED . I. WHETHER A FUNDAMENTAL DEFECT IS SUFFICIENT TO SATISFY THE ; SAVING CLAUSE WHERE PETITIONER ERRONEOUS ENHANCE SENTENCE FELL BENEATH THE STATUTORY MAXIMUM. . ‘ . . 4 .

Docket Entries

2019-10-07
Petition DENIED.
2019-09-05
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/1/2019.
2019-08-27
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
Main Document
2019-07-30
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due September 13, 2019)
Motion for Leave to Proceed in Forma PauperisPetitionAppendixProof of Service

Attorneys

Marlon Porch
Marlon Leroy Porch — Petitioner
Marlon Leroy Porch — Petitioner
United States
Noel J. Francisco — Solicitor General, Respondent
Noel J. Francisco — Solicitor General, Respondent