Is the court's failure to set aside a void judgment due to lack of prior notice and right to be heard a fatal defect?

Questions for Review ; 1. Contrary to all 12 circuits, Is the court’s failure to set aside a Void judgment that is due to the failure to give prior notice and right to be heard a : fatal defect that can not be given legal effect and is the injured party entitled to relief due to the orders of the lower courts being void due to a standing Order of , Judge Gerry that allows Due Process to notice and being heard to be denied to all litigants? A19,20,42; 2. Do mandatory, administrative, ministerial, or non-discretionary acts ~ accord Absolute immunity under Rule 55(a) and (b)(1) for the clerk and 55(a) and (b)(2) for the judge and trump Due Process of law to notice and right to be heard before an order is entered? : 3. Is the issue of the nature of the function a factual dispute that requires . a plenary hearing? . : : 4. Given that all 12 circuits have held that there is no discretion to not set aside a void order for violations of Due Process to notice or to be heard and given .. that this court held that judges have no immunity for lack of discretion that are , such for void orders, are the 7 lower court judges liable for promoting and enforcing said void orders and intentionally denying our rights? p> | i