Tina Davis v. Texas Children's Hospital
SocialSecurity Immigration
Whether the district court abused its discretion in granting summary judgment under Rule 60(b) and denying the appellant's motion for summary judgment, given the issues of judge disqualification, compliance with EEOC law, wrongful termination, discrimination/retaliation, and heightened pleading standard
Question Presented The Court review[s].the district court’s decision granting the summary judgment under Rule 60 ; (b) for abuse of discretion . A. The Notice of Appeal of having Judge Hitmer retrieved from the case from violation of Rule 18(b) Recusal and Disqualification of a Judge, was the request willful blinded by the courts? 1). Been partner with the Haynes and Boone Law Firm when he was : practicing Law. The information was recovered on the internet and SEALED with the district court Doc.33ROA.636 entered in court on 5/21/2018. . B. Was the Denying of Summary Judgment Motion showing Favoritism to the defendant? , 1). Materials to support the fact of charges filed on TCH and The EEOC Right to Sue Letter was provided to the court on 1/27/2018 C. Was the Final Judgment a unjust and unethical decision by Judge Hitter? Oo D. Was the dismissing of the case in compliance with the Ten Amendment : "Bill of Rights, the VII Amendment and the ERA Amendment? \