No. 19-5597
Randall B. Lord v. United States
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: administrative-law agency-deference agency-discretion agency-regulation bitcoin-exchange chevron-deference civil-procedure due-process money-transmission plain-error regulatory-deference statutory-interpretation
Key Terms:
AdministrativeLaw
AdministrativeLaw
Latest Conference:
2019-10-01
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Is it a plain error for the District Court to defer to an agency's regulation before identifying ambiguity in the plain meaning of a statute?
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTIONS PRESENTED I. Is it a plain error for the District Court to ; : regulatory deference to an agency's regulation : before identifying ambiguity in the plain meaning of a statute? II. Does buying cryptocurrency (Bitcoin) from an . exchange and selling it to customers at a profit ‘meet the definition of a money transmitter under 18 U.S.C. §1960? i ‘
Docket Entries
2019-10-07
Petition DENIED.
2019-08-29
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/1/2019.
2019-08-23
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2019-06-12
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due September 16, 2019)
Attorneys
United States
Noel J. Francisco — Solicitor General, Respondent
Noel J. Francisco — Solicitor General, Respondent