Whether the District Court failed to rule consistent with the Insanity Defense Reform Act

No question identified. : * Queston Ouestiovs YU } s 1 . \ . } “ ‘ 1, . RK c a _ i D) Whether the_District Court Foiled To Rule consistent . ' ' e , 4 _|with-the Insanity Defense Reform Act IPUSC.ITQVOS A e wes a __s topples to_moking oN ditterentotion between Sawify. §§-— 4 "S. ___|at the time of the offense (and) tompetene: To. stond * ! Rial”, evtitled.o¢_ay sdigent to. oP (150), oud) ass— __Wsfawee vessossany To prepare ow offective defense bosed avhis mental conidia, » ott + oabegt % | | __.__.___| d.whether the Disteich court fas led to Rule. consistewt im \ , te ‘ | en? "Rule 12.2 of the ERP. 4242 _by failing to provide } a ¢ ¢ Ta 3. ; I S2CONG @) amiNnotio by ag jiTleo expe at to evel gre tne hoe x: 4 IZ: ; “tp f. ——i___}fie mental State of mind(M zo) of the defeudoait Bigelpsand 77 ya 5 i. j < “py © . ‘ , _—_ fv mest; ‘gate tad to dete amine the extevt-of whevcing ; , Fa ¢ 4 ~ = -—-__—_ Waclgrks of fecki g Big 4 cow's" hatig all BL) ih thet uns Caused —_—_—_—_ iby the bee, hiption thehap ‘ neni —___ | . : my " _[20) (lines. 2t=a5) Ss | ) a | | t Mt | ~ t 4 4 _|..3) whether the District Court abused theik Discretion’ __ Vs a ° ’ . —— “Danying Bigelows Motion towithdaaw the guity __._ i Plea’ considering defewse counsel avis failure to looll ds Bioelowss pa GRES edical Rk cond s “het ec] we 4 a PS a ‘hotel * nose mental Health paoghess Revie w file contained : Bigelows ding nosis, prescriptions used tha thekapy treatmert adverse reactions, charges of meditas tion, pshreotic: epescdes, doctors _gpimiaus tir cOR€ = |Birchw’s_aesnowses oud some personel he het and. i “ote, Attew tion is called to the tact thet it 15. ——} ow opinion tot those vetegoa! Administration med~ . col progress Revel NTRS yald howe chowoed the | Le | outcome, ond. an ided a. een sonahle doubt of quilt, _ 2. | Duether the district count was blac us'th | thea decisions, allowiig_detewse cpipse! Davis to shay the rad displysscob= I stitutional violations of due procéss,metboctive in. _WvestianHonof caucilex<ists Ip. pe stivote mental heal Records, Stew tupecl erro s, Fuamental RaRoRs Pla ektors, ethics ChRoRS, Gomabthatmanees : 5), he: ek the Disteict Cougt prog egs.discrimnates looaust o class of perale ORE Us able to seek out ; ly and the cha ages being _ prosecuted agaiust them’ Because of the many dif. deren? symp tows and lohelsfor ther, itappcoas thatthe —»—— disabled T _&_ _ 7a