No. 19-56

Mark Milner, et al. v. Vincent Mares, Executive Director, New Mexico Racing Commission, et al.

Lower Court: Tenth Circuit
Docketed: 2019-07-09
Status: Denied
Type: Paid
Response Waived
Tags: 42-U.S.C.-§-1983 42-usc-1983 civil-procedure civil-rights constitutional-rights due-process government-accountability harlow-v-fitzgerald new-mexico qualified-immunity
Key Terms:
AdministrativeLaw SocialSecurity DueProcess JusticiabilityDoctri
Latest Conference: 2019-10-01
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Did the lower courts err in dismissing Petitioners' cases on the basis of Qualified Immunity in the face of US Supreme Court precedent and New Mexico jurisprudence clearly establishing the right that was violated?

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

question presented is: Did the lower courts err in dismissing Petitioners’ cases on the basis of Qualified Immunity in the face of US Supreme Court precedent and New Mexico jurisprudence clearly establishing the right that was violated?

Docket Entries

2019-10-07
Petition DENIED.
2019-07-17
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/1/2019.
2019-07-15
Waiver of right of respondents Vincent Mares, et al. to respond filed.
Main Document
2019-06-05
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due August 8, 2019)
PetitionAppendixCertificate of Word CountProof of Service

Attorneys

Mark Milner, et al.
Aubrey Blair Dunn — Western Agriculture, Resource and Business Advocates, LLP, Petitioner
Aubrey Blair Dunn — Western Agriculture, Resource and Business Advocates, LLP, Petitioner
Vincent Mares, et al.
Stephen Samuel Hamilton — Montgomery & Andrews, P.A., Respondent
Stephen Samuel Hamilton — Montgomery & Andrews, P.A., Respondent