No. 19-5605
Stephen Alan Macomber v. Kansas
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: 4th-amendment 5th-amendment burden-of-proof civil-liberties constitutional-rights due-process equal-protection fair-trial fourteenth-amendment sixth-amendment state-action use-of-force
Latest Conference:
2019-10-01
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Did the trial courts fail to give a specific use-of-force presumption, thereby lowering the burden of proof for the state and violating the defendant's right to due process and a fair trial as guaranteed by the Fourteenth and Sixth Amendments to the United States Constitution?
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTION(S) PRESENTED |, DID WE TRIAL courRTS FARE TO QIWE A SPEAFIC USE-OF-DERDU> Forte PRESLMPTOD | TreteucTied LOWER THE BuepE oF pRoor FOR THE STATE ASD \J(OLATE MACOMBERS RIGHT To DUE PROaESS AWD A FRR TRIG LOAWTRED Bu THE Fooeteeott APD SAT AMERDMAITS TO THE DNMTED OTKTES dONSTITUTION \
Docket Entries
2019-10-07
Petition DENIED.
2019-09-12
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/1/2019.
2019-09-05
Waiver of right of respondent Kansas to respond filed.
2019-08-12
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due September 23, 2019)
Attorneys
Kansas
Toby Crouse — Office of Attorney General Derek Schmidt, Respondent
Toby Crouse — Office of Attorney General Derek Schmidt, Respondent