No. 19-5605
Stephen Alan Macomber v. Kansas
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: 4th-amendment 5th-amendment burden-of-proof civil-liberties constitutional-rights due-process equal-protection fair-trial fourteenth-amendment sixth-amendment state-action use-of-force
Latest Conference:
2019-10-01
Question Presented (from Petition)
1. 'Olb'THE COURTS, "Tb fe'DE '
ft 9^)ec\Ficl OS^-DF-'C )'=k'vx-^' FftRCe: -ceirsw^ncO
X^stb'Actic^ lower Ttt^ l5u£D£b or orocF
TOR "YHE STf^S /Fb \JlOLAVr AAKCC>AA.Qr<i2
Kl&rtT TO DDF ?>GOQP55 NAD N. fl\\B.lUvN(^owntpfd m thf Foortffot 'h
fpD FFV Fl^DwvaitS T6 FtF O^nrD
STFXEs QD^ST\TVT\ dO ?
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Did the trial courts fail to give a specific use-of-force presumption, thereby lowering the burden of proof for the state and violating the defendant's right to due process and a fair trial as guaranteed by the Fourteenth and Sixth Amendments to the United States Constitution?
Docket Entries
2019-10-07
Petition DENIED.
2019-09-12
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/1/2019.
2019-09-05
Waiver of right of respondent Kansas to respond filed.
2019-08-12
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due September 23, 2019)
Attorneys
Kansas
Toby Crouse — Office of Attorney General Derek Schmidt, Respondent
Stephen Macomber
Stephen Alan Macomber — Petitioner