No. 19-5616

Russell Rope v. Facebook, Inc., et al.

Lower Court: Ninth Circuit
Docketed: 2019-08-16
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
Response WaivedRelisted (2)IFP
Tags: civil-procedure civil-rights constitutional-rights discrimination due-process equal-protection fraud judicial-integrity legal-standing pro-se-litigation standing
Key Terms:
DueProcess Privacy
Latest Conference: 2020-01-10 (distributed 2 times)
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether the law extends to all citizens & corporations in modern times

Question Presented (from Petition)

QUESTIONS PRESENTED . Whether The Law Extends to All Citizens & Corporations in Modern Times? % How can an unwritten, nonexistent, and unfiled appeal be labeled or described as anything let alone be dismissed as “frivolous,” and how is the appeal and or this case allegedly frivolous? Whether an Appeal can be dismissed before it is filed? % Every Defendant has the right to counsel, but what about every Plaintiff; especially when the Plaintiff is financially disabled and only taking legal action in self-defense? Whether a Plaintiff's case can be legally dismissed in the appellate court before requested council is appointed? | | % What is missing to successfully state a claim for RICO if Plaintiff did not successfully state the claim where he did indeed allege all elements and provided a short and simple statement of the claim in the First Amended Complaint? Whether Plaintiff successfully stated a claim in The Complaint and First Amended Complaint (“FAC”)? %& Whether res judicata is license to keep committing new instances of the same crime? %* Whether it is legal for a judge to intentionally neglect requested explanations for due process obstructing decisions upon request for said information by a pro se litigant? 2 % Whether Judges are allowed to make decisions based on information obtained from sources that are not on the docket such as slanderous behind the back private communications, opinions of a-party’s social media, coming from other judges, or against a Plaintiff in any way if allegations are not directly disputed? y& Whether fraud Defendant attorneys coercing or playing some role in conspiracy to bribe justice obstructing judges and/or the judges themselves must be criminally charged and/or disbarred and permanently blocked from any position of authority? % Whether the current Justices of the Supreme Court of The United States have the integrity to hold justice obstructors accountable for their seriously criminal actions? % Whether all citizens have equal protections under the law, not limited and specifically in regards to due process and equal employment opportunity rights regardless of birth order ranks within a family, or relationship, marital, and/or parental status? % Whether or not the Ninth Circuit had access to exhibits lodged/sealed in District Court and if access would have made a difference, and if neglect of that question in correspondence to the court was obstruction of justice? y%& Whether a SCOTUS Petitioner in forma pauperis, at least upon request in . extraordinary circumstances, deserves leniency no less equal to that of a falsely imprisoned pro se litigant, not limited to submitting a one copy of everything? 3

Docket Entries

2020-01-13
Rehearing DENIED.
2019-12-18
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/10/2020.
2019-11-09
Petition for Rehearing filed.
2019-10-15
Petition DENIED.
2019-09-19
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/11/2019.
2019-09-13
Waiver of right of respondent JPMorgan Chase Bank, NA to respond filed.
2019-09-13
Waiver of right of respondents Alphabet Inc. and Twitter, Inc. to respond filed.
2019-09-13
Waiver of right of respondent Apple Inc. to respond filed.
2019-08-26
Waiver of right of respondent Facebook, Inc. to respond filed.
2019-05-08
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due September 16, 2019)

Attorneys

Alphabet Inc. and Twitter, Inc.
Sunita BaliPerkins Cole, LLP, Respondent
Sunita BaliPerkins Cole, LLP, Respondent
Apple Inc.
Rebecca FurmanLewis & Llewellyn, LLP, Respondent
Rebecca FurmanLewis & Llewellyn, LLP, Respondent
Facebook, Inc.
Paven MalhotraKeker, Van Nest & Peters LLP, Respondent
Paven MalhotraKeker, Van Nest & Peters LLP, Respondent
JPMorgan Chase Bank, NA
Brett D. WastonLombardi & Donohue, LLP, Respondent
Brett D. WastonLombardi & Donohue, LLP, Respondent
Russell Rope
Russell Rope — Petitioner
Russell Rope — Petitioner