1.
DID THE COURT BELOW WAIVE IT'S POLICY OF NOT TO REVIEW OR OVERTURN ANY
DECISION RENDERED BY AND FROM THE APPEALS COURT OF DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA IN
CASE NUMBERED USCA 19-5009 ?

2.
IN IT'S SWORN TO OBLIGATIONS , AND ACCEPTENCE OF JURIST JUDGESHIP, AND TO THE
CONSTITUTION OF THE UNITED STATES AND IT'S ARTICLES, SHOULD ANY UNITED STATES
COURT CORRECT ANY INJUSTICE AND OR MISCARRAIGE OF JUSTICE AND LAW WHICH IS
PRESENTED BEFORE IT'S TRIBUNAL AND OR COURT , FOR REVIEW?

3.
DID OR HAS ANY OF THE COURTS BELOW , ANSWER DIRECTLY TO THE CHARGED COUNT
OF RAPE AND SEX OFFENDER REGISTRATION IN CRIMINAL CASE F-33483 AS IT PERTAINS
THE CHARGED CRIMINAL CASE F-33483 D-76, WHEN PRESENTED FOR REVIEW BY THIS
APPELLANT?

4.
DID, OR DOES THE RECORDS IN IT'S ENTIRETY , SUPPORT A FINDING OF GUILTY FOR THE
CRIMINAL CHARGE OF RAPE AS PER COUNT" D" IN CHARGED INDICTMENT F-33483-76?

5.
DID , BOTH , THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS , AND THE
FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS , BOTH , IN IT'S SUPERVISORY CONTROL OF CUSTODIAL
AUTHORITIES TO , HOLD , MAINTAIN , KEEP AND INCARCERATE THIS APPELLANT , FAIL
TO ADHERE TO THEIR INHERENT POWERS TO TREAT , SUSTAIN , PREPARE AND REGISTER
THIS APPELLANT AS AN SEX OFFENDER , PER ORDER OF A COURT OF LAW , AS IT
PERTAINS TO SEX OFFENDER CONVICTIONS , WHICH REQUIRE THEM TO HAVE ANY
OFFENDER TO REGISTER AS AN SEX OFFENDER( BEFORE ) RELEASE FROM AND DURING
THE ENTIRE PERIOD OF INCARCERATIONS FROM 1976 THROUGHOUT 2003, WHERE
APPELLANT WAS RELEASED , NOT ONLY FROM THE CRIMINAL INDICTMENT IN F-33483-76
(WHICH WAS DULY EXECUTED AND RELEASED VIA PAROLE IN 1982 ) BUT YET AND
ENTIRELY DIFFERENT AND SEPARATE CONVICTION IN 1984 FOR DRUG RELATED CRIMINAL
CHARGED CONVICTION , TO WHICH THIS APPELLANT WAS EVENTUALLY RELEASED TO
PAROLE IN 2003 AND WHERE ONLY THEN WERE THE SEX OFFENDER RELATED
REGISTRATION WAS THEN ORDERED TO BE ENFORCED, NEARLY 30 YEARS AFTER THE
PROPOSED RAPE CONVICTION ?

6.
SHOULD THE DEFENDANTS IN THE INSTANT APPEAL CONTINUE, ANY LAWFUL CUSTODIAL
CONTROLS OVER THIS APPELLANT AFTER SOME 50 YEARS OF COMPLETE COMPLIANCE
WHERE NOT AN INKLING OF SEX OFFENSE(S) HAS EVER BEEN REPORTED ?

7.
SHOULD THIS HONORABLE COURT , WITHIN IT'S SUPERVISORY POSITION , WITHIN THE
CONSRVATIONS OF PRESERVING THE INTEGRITY OF THE UNITED STATES

Whether the court below waived its policy of not reviewing or overturning decisions from the D.C. Appeals Court