Whether the court below waived its policy of not reviewing or overturning decisions from the D.C. Appeals Court

QUESTION(S) PRESENTED e a IN THE UNITED STATES SUPREME COURT . OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA ISSUES PRESENTED FOR REVIEW 1. DID THE COURT BELOW WAIVE IT’S POLICY OF NOT TO REVIEW OR OVERTURN ANY DECISION RENDERED BY AND FROM THE APPEALS COURT OF DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA IN CASE NUMBERED USCA 19-5009 ? 2. IN IT’S SWORN TO OBLIGATIONS, AND ACCEPTENCE OF JURIST JUDGESHIP, AND TO THE CONSTITUTION OF THE UNITED STATES AND IT’S ARTICLES, SHOULD ANY UNITED STATES COURT CORRECT ANY INJUSTICE AND OR MISCARRAIGE OF JUSTICE AND LAW WHICH IS PRESENTED BEFORE IT’S TRIBUNAL AND OR COURT-, FOR REVIEW ? 3, DID OR HAS ANY OF THE COURTS BELOW , ANSWER DIRECTLY TO THE CHARGED COUNT OF RAPE AND SEX OFFENDER REGISTRATION IN CRIMINAL CASE F-33483 AS IT PERTAINS THE CHARGED CRIMINAL CASE F-33483 D-76, WHEN PRESENTED FOR REVIEW BY THIS APPELLANT ? 4. DID, OR DOES THE RECORDS IN IT’S ENTIRETY, SUPPORT A FINDING OF GUILTY FOR THE CRIMINAL CHARGE OF RAPE AS PER COUNT“ D” IN CHARGED INDICTMENT F-33483-76? 5. DID , BOTH ,. THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS , AND THE FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS , BOTH, IN IT’S SUPERVISORY CONTROL OF CUSTODIAL AUTHORITIES TO , HOLD , MAINTAIN , KEEP AND INCARCERATE THIS APPELLANT , FAIL TO ADHERE TO THEIR INHERENT POWERS TO TREAT , SUSTAIN , PREPARE AND REGISTER THIS APPELLANT AS AN SEX OFFENDER , PER ORDER OF A COURT OF LAW , AS IT PERTAINS TO SEX OFFENDER CONVICTIONS , WHICH REQUIRE THEM TO HAVE ANY OFFENDER TO REGISTER AS AN SEX OFFENDER( BEFORE) RELEASE FROM AND DURING THE ENTIRE PERIOD OF INCARCERATIONS FROM 1976 THROUGHOUT 2003 , WHERE APPELLANT WAS RELEASED , NOT ONLY FROM THE CRIMINAL INDICTMENT IN F-33483 -76 (WHICH WAS DULY EXECUTED AND RELEASED VIA PAROLE 1N 1982) BUT YET AND ENTIRELY DIFFERENT AND SEPARATE CONVICTION IN 1984 FOR DRUG RELATED CRIMINAL CHARGED CONVICTION , TO WHICH THIS APPELLANT WAS EVENTUALLY RELEASED TO PAROLE IN 2003 AND WHERE ONLY THEN WERE THE SEX OFFENDER RELATED REGISTRATION WAS THEN ORDERED TO BE ENFORCED, NEARLY 30 YEARS AFTER THE PROPOSED RAPE CONVICTION ? 6. SHOULD THE DEFENDANTS IN THE INSTANT APPEAL CONTINUE, ANY LAWFUL CUSTODIAL CONTROLS OVER THIS APPELLANT AFTER SOME 50 YEARS OF COMPLETE COMPLIANCE WHERE NOT AN INKLING OF SEX OFFENSE(S) HAS EVER BEEN REPORTED ? 7. SHOULD THIS HONORABLE COURT , WITHIN IT’S SUPERVISORY POSITION , WITHIN THE CONSRVATIONS OF PRESERVING THE INTEGRITY OF THE UNITED STATES CONSTITUTION ; AND THE FAIRNESS OF JUSTICE FOR ALL , ORDER THAT THIS APPELLANT BE RELEASED FROM THE CUSTODIAL CUSTODIES OF THE COURT SERVICES AND OFFENDER REGISTRATION AGENCY AND ALL CORRESPONDENCE RELATING TO A CONVICTION OF RAPE IN THE INDICTMENT AND CRIMINAL CASE NUMBERED F-33483-76 , BE HEREIN : ERA! ATED AND DELETED FROM ANY AND ALL PUBLIC RECORDS, IT IS SO MOVED! . S F. JOHNSON , P Ss