Does the due process clause create an entitlement to a reasonably prompt sentencing hearing, and what is the analytical standard to determine when delay in sentencing violates due process?

QUESTIONS PRESENTED oo I. ; IN THE WAKE OF THE QUESTION LEFT OPEN BY ‘THE COURT IN BETTERMAN v. MONTANA, 136 S.CT. 1609 (2016), DOES THE DUE PROCESS CLAUSE CREATE AN ENTITLEMENT TO A REASONABLY PROMPT SENTENCING HEARING AND, IF SO, WHAT IS THE ANALYTICAL STANDARD TO DETERMINE WHEN DELAY IN SENTENCING VIOLATES DUE PROCESS? Il. ONCE A CRIMINAL PROSECUTION BEGINS AND AN INDIGENT DEFENDANT'S RIGHT TO COUNSEL HAS ATTACHED, MAY THE STATE'S SUBSEQUENT SUSPENSION OF THE SENTENCING PROCEEDING INCLUDE THE SUSPENSION OF THE RIGHT TO THE ASSISTANCE OF COUNSEL — SO THAT THE STATE ITSELF DICTATES THE AVAILABILITY OF COUNSEL'S ASSISTANCE BASED UPON ITS DECISION TO RESUME THE ; PROCEEDINGS, IF EVER? | oo , -i .