No. 19-5639
IFP
Tags: civil-rights criminal-procedure deprivation-of-rights due-process evidence-of-proof evidentiary-standards fair-trial grand-jury indictment judicial-error legal-procedure petitioner standing trial-court
Key Terms:
Environmental SocialSecurity Securities Immigration
Environmental SocialSecurity Securities Immigration
Latest Conference:
2019-10-18
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the trial court erred in charging my client with crimes not assessed by the grand jury prior to the trial
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
No question identified. : — | QuesTron's PaesewreD \ _Snelher the cial Court erred to chavgi my he , UE n__I sued__ wot aves sAessed Aaa SS! N. tac. 1__Of8 Ye : by “the _gaches prior 4s _oe at tetal 2 cach _—__ Toes Mors_begrive: pedsbioder too fair tefal 2 a _ tahebther the: teal Court erred lou — Fecha bo a fey the O.0.0BaN.4 08 Manesng) task : ecist 6 GdSonktus —ewsbeace of pref Sera _ Vrsavlts —unler OLGR O-YNI3 as Jd it deprive terval 2?
Docket Entries
2019-10-21
Petition DENIED.
2019-10-03
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/18/2019.
2019-08-13
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due September 18, 2019)