1) What is the scope of the evidence for a court's assessment of innocence under 28 U.S.C. § 2244 (b)(2)(B)(ii) ? Is a court of appeals ' consideration of exculpatory evidence limited to the specific newly discovered evidence supporting the new constitutional claim or should the court undertake a more holistic evaluation of the evidence as a whole as required under Schlup v. Del o, 513 U.S. 298 (1995) ?

2) Where an applicant has discovered that State sponsored testimony at trial was scientifically invalid, should such testimony be considered "false and misleading testimony " such that the applicant has been denied due process in violation of the United States Constitution ?

What is the scope of the evidence for a court's assessment of innocence under 28 U.S.C. § 2244(b)(2)(B)(i)?