No. 19-5648
Desmond Justin Murray v. Mark S. Inch, Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections, et al.
Tags: 28-usc-2253 appellate-procedure basis-for-denying-relief certificate-of-appealability habeas-corpus jurists-of-reason merits-of-claims standard-of-review
Key Terms:
HabeasCorpus
HabeasCorpus
Latest Conference:
2019-10-01
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether a petitioner seeking the issuance of a certificate of appealability under 28 U.S.C. § 2253 is required to demonstrate that jurists of reason would find the merits of his claims debatable, or, instead, to demonstrate only that jurists of reason would find the basis for denying relief itself debatable?
Question Presented (from Petition)
QUESTION PRESENTED Whether a petitioner seeking the issuance of a certificate of appealability under 28 U.S.C. § 2253 is required to demonstrate that jurists of reason would find the merits of his claims debatable, or, instead, to demonstrate only that jurists of reason would find the basis for denying relief itself debatable? i
Docket Entries
2019-10-07
Petition DENIED.
2019-09-12
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/1/2019.
2019-09-05
Waiver of right of respondents Inch, Sec., FL DOC, et al. to respond filed.
2019-08-12
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due September 19, 2019)
Attorneys
Desmond Justin Murray
Dane Kristofor Chase — Chase Law Florida P.A., Petitioner
Dane Kristofor Chase — Chase Law Florida P.A., Petitioner
Inch, Sec., FL DOC, et al.