Whether the trial court lacked the authority to set aside the conviction and dismiss the cause

QUESTION(S) PRESENTED ; \. EE THE TREAL COURT LACKED TUhxé rere THEN AN ABRELLATZ COURY ONLY HAS TURES = | JECTION TD ZET THE CONVECTSON = TUNGMENT > expe AND Peemrss THZCAUSE, OTHE TREAL COURT (THE CouRT FW eRetouAL APREALE LE TEKAS QUACTEN AN etbReb WR ND. AA RSA-O\ EN CAUSE NO, 94, TSU-B-| SMe SAVUARY A, 1494 “nse TRE. ND. 4S Had DA WR-VAASY-V-AS CollLueran oF TREANZAN. 2, GURTECT MATTER URES DECTION MABE CHL Gat AT ANTSME ReroRE NuRaue OR ACTER TRERKL Pwd A TURCSD KCTSONNL CUMLEN GE OF TALE TY PE NEVER cs Lemer > ED Sxned eT GOs TOME PUNDATION OP WHEMER Perera’ Chee Caulh BE ' TWenad Od Te FeRper pce KATHE COLLOQUY OF THE TREAL COURT / Me COURT OF CREMa yl APE ALS OP TEXAS No 2URIECT “ MPATERR SURES N RCT aan) RECORDS AWN RE Pal ACE OP TRE me | S OWE YOU CHALLENGE Reebeopaty SNA CRemMouKkL CAGe THE 14H S<sTRTOV COURT WAS THE RURKED OF PROOF : UNRER AS WEL. € SSL LAN" |