No. 19-5674
Ed Teague, II v. Regent Financial Group, Inc., et al.
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: appellate-review civil-procedure failure-to-state-a-claim failure-to-state-claim judicial-interpretation legal-principles motion-to-dismiss pleading-requirements standard-of-review
Key Terms:
SocialSecurity Immigration
SocialSecurity Immigration
Latest Conference:
2019-10-18
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the court of appeal's decision below contradicts existing legal principles when evaluating a motion to dismiss for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTION(S) PRESENTED @ Whether the court of appeal’s decision below contradicts existing legal principles when evaluating a motion to dismiss for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted. Gi)
Docket Entries
2019-10-21
Petition DENIED.
2019-10-03
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/18/2019.
2019-09-24
Waiver of right of respondent Regent Financial Group, Inc. to respond filed.
2019-09-23
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2019-08-19
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due September 23, 2019)
Attorneys
Regent Financial Group, Inc.
Craig A. Knickrehm — Walentine O'Toole, LLP, Respondent
Craig A. Knickrehm — Walentine O'Toole, LLP, Respondent
United States
Noel J. Francisco — Solicitor General, Respondent
Noel J. Francisco — Solicitor General, Respondent