No. 19-5694
Craig Farley v. Ralph Diaz, Secretary, California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation
IFP
Tags: consciousness-of-guilt constitutional-rights counsel-performance criminal-trial exculpatory-evidence identification-evidence ineffective-assistance ineffective-assistance-of-counsel lack-of-identification-evidence phone-records sixth-amendment strickland-standard trial-counsel
Key Terms:
HabeasCorpus
HabeasCorpus
Latest Conference:
2019-10-18
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Is there any reasonable argument that trial counsel satisfied the Strickland standard when he failed to introduce crucial lack of identification evidence at trial?
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTIONS PRESENTED 1. Is there any reasonable argument that trial counsel satisfied the Strickland standard when he failed to introduce crucial lack of identification evidence at trial? 2. Is there any reasonable argument that trial counsel satisfied the Strickland standard when he failed to introduce crucial phone records and testimony that could have rebutted inculpatory prosecution’s evidence purportedly showing consciousness of guilt. ii
Docket Entries
2019-10-21
Petition DENIED.
2019-10-03
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/18/2019.
2018-11-26
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due September 23, 2019)
Attorneys
Craig Farley
Scott Kernan, Secretary, California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation
David Delgado-Rucci — California Attorney General's Office, Respondent
David Delgado-Rucci — California Attorney General's Office, Respondent