No. 19-5698
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: 5th-amendment 6th-amendment civil-rights confession-elicitation custodial-interrogation due-process edwards-v-arizona law-enforcement-tactics miranda-rights pre-charge-investigation right-to-counsel undercover-agent
Key Terms:
DueProcess FifthAmendment CriminalProcedure JusticiabilityDoctri
DueProcess FifthAmendment CriminalProcedure JusticiabilityDoctri
Latest Conference:
2019-10-01
Question Presented (AI Summary)
May law enforcement use an undercover agent to elicit a confession from a suspect before charges have been filed but after a suspect has already invoked his right to counsel during a custodial interrogation?
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTION PRESENTED May law enforcement use an undercover agent to elicit a confession from a suspect before charges have been filed but after a suspect has already invoked his right to counsel during a custodial interrogation? i
Docket Entries
2019-10-07
Petition DENIED.
2019-09-12
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/1/2019.
2019-08-30
Waiver of right of respondent The People of the State of California to respond filed.
2019-08-19
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due September 23, 2019)
Attorneys
Eduardo Orozco
Brad Kannof Kaiserman — The Law Office of Brad K. Kaiserman, Petitioner
Brad Kannof Kaiserman — The Law Office of Brad K. Kaiserman, Petitioner
The People of the State of California
Daniel Chi-Sum Chang — California Attorney General's Office, Respondent
Daniel Chi-Sum Chang — California Attorney General's Office, Respondent