No. 19-5706
James Gregory Armistead v. Laura P. Watson, et al.
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: civil-procedure civil-rights due-process federal-state-relations standing takings workforce-investment
Latest Conference:
2019-10-01
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the Court of Appeals erred in denying petitioners' claim as time-barred
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTION(S) PRESENTED WHE THER CouRT OF APPEALS CIRCUT T _ | COURT ERROR FOR DENYING PETITIONERS WA S.C. 8 1993 CLATM AS TIME BARRED 7 _ WHEN PFTITTONERS CLATMS TS BASEFON ——_AN INJUNCT TON, Al80 PETITIONERS —_CLATM WAS BASED ONWORKFORCE INVE C oKE “T RAC . ( NYING PETITLI 6 HELD STATE'S AND FE LAC _ | ERAT TL THE FULFIL Y FORCE AGREEMENT a eee
Docket Entries
2019-10-07
Petition DENIED.
2019-09-12
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/1/2019.
2019-09-03
Waiver of right of respondents Laura P. Watson, et al. to respond filed.
2019-08-19
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due September 23, 2019)
Attorneys
Laura P. Watson, et al.
Clarence Joe DelForge III — N.C. Department of Justice, Respondent
Clarence Joe DelForge III — N.C. Department of Justice, Respondent