No. 19-5711
Charles Fritsche v. Robert Legrand, Warden, et al.
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: buck-v-davis certificate-of-appealability criminal-procedure due-process federal-habeas-corpus habeas-corpus ineffective-assistance-of-counsel ninth-circuit ninth-circuit-review post-conviction post-conviction-proceedings
Key Terms:
DueProcess HabeasCorpus Punishment Privacy JusticiabilityDoctri
DueProcess HabeasCorpus Punishment Privacy JusticiabilityDoctri
Latest Conference:
2019-10-01
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether this Court Should Grant this Petition, Vacate the Ninth Circuit's Certificate of Appealability Denial, and Remand the Matter for Further Reconsideration in Light of Buck v. Davis, 137 S.Ct. 759 (2017)?
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTION PRESENTED Whether this Court Should Grant this Petition, Vacate the Ninth Circuit’s Certificate of Appealability Denial, and Remand the Matter for Further Reconsideration in Light of Buck v. Davis, 137 S.Ct. 759 (2017)? i
Docket Entries
2019-10-07
Petition DENIED.
2019-09-12
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/1/2019.
2019-09-03
Waiver of right of respondents Robert Legrand, et al. to respond filed.
2019-08-21
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due September 25, 2019)
Attorneys
Charles Fritsche
Jason F Carr — Federal Public Defenders Office, Petitioner
Jason F Carr — Federal Public Defenders Office, Petitioner