Whether, upon invalidating one of two alternative theories of liability presented to a jury, the reviewing court should ask if there is 'sufficient evidence' to justify predicating liability on the remaining theory of liability; a 'reasonable probability' that the jury so found; or 'evidence beyond a reasonable doubt' that the jury so found?

QUESTIONS PRESENTED 1. Whether, upon invalidating one of two alternative theories of liability presented to a jury, the reviewing court should ask if there is “sufficient evidence” to justify predicating liability on the remaining theory of liability; a “reasonable probability” that the jury so found; or “evidence beyond a reasonable doubt” that the jury so found? 2. Whether Congress, pursuant to its authority over foreign affairs and immigration, can dictate to states how to structure their own political processes?