Whether petitioner's 3167 month sentence imposed as a result of this court's misinterpretation of the stacking provisions of 18 U.S.C. 924(c)(1)(A) is cruel and unusual punishment

QUESTIONS PRESENTED FOR REVIEW : I. WHETHER PETITIONER'S 3167 MONTH SENTENCE IMPOSED AS A RESULT OF THIS COURT'S MISINTERPRETATION OF THE STACKING PROVISIONS OF 18 U.S.C. 924(c)(1)(A)(@® IS CRUEL AND UNUSUAL PUNISHMENT PARTICULARLY IN LIGHT OF THE FIRST STEP ACT'S DESCRIPTION OF THE AMENDMENT AS A CLARIFICATION OF THE ORIGINAL MEANING OF 924(c)(1)(A)(i) DECLARING THE INTENT OF CONGRESS WAS TO MAKE THE STACKING PROVISIONS APPLICABLE TO FINAL CONVICTIONS ONLY?