No. 19-5754
Charmar Brown v. United States
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: advisory-guidelines collateral-attack constitutional-challenge criminal-procedure cross-reference double-jeopardy due-process habeas-corpus magwood magwood-precedent sentencing sentencing-guidelines
Key Terms:
DueProcess HabeasCorpus
DueProcess HabeasCorpus
Latest Conference:
2019-10-01
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether Magwood extended to challenges to the original undisturbed conviction, following a new judgment?
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTIONS PRESENTED ; 1. Whether Magwood extended to challenges to the original ; undisturbed conviction, following a new judgment? ; 2. Whether Murder Cross-reference §.8.5.6. 2D1:1(d}(1) . cross referencing 2A1.i1 which instructs the court to : impose a mandatory life sentence, is unconstitutional . even under an advisory Guideline regime? , , i . :
Docket Entries
2019-10-07
Petition DENIED. Justice Kagan took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.
2019-09-12
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/1/2019.
2019-09-05
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2019-06-27
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due September 30, 2019)
Attorneys
Charmar Brown
Charmar Brown — Petitioner
United States
Noel J. Francisco — Solicitor General, Respondent