No. 19-576

Interior Glass Systems, Inc. v. United States

Lower Court: Ninth Circuit
Docketed: 2019-11-01
Status: Denied
Type: Paid
Response Waived
Tags: administrative-hearing due-process hearing irs iRS-collection penalties seizure statutory-interpretation tax tax-penalties vagueness vagueness-doctrine
Key Terms:
ERISA SocialSecurity DueProcess
Latest Conference: 2019-12-06
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Is the collection of tax penalties an exception to the requirements of due process, or does a citizen have a right to a hearing before the IRS seizes thousands, or even millions, of dollars in tax penalties?

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

QUESTIONS PRESENTED 1. Is the collection of tax penalties an exception to the requirements of due process, or does a citizen have a right to a hearing before the IRS seizes thousands, or even millions, of dollars in tax penalties? 2. Ifthe citizen has a right to a hearing, does a meeting with an IRS Appeals Officer satisfy the requirement of a “meaningful” pre-collection hearing? 3. Does the IRS’s broad interpretation of “substantially similar” render the penalty statute so vague and unpredictable that no person of “common intelligence” could anticipate what types of plans would need to be reported?

Docket Entries

2019-12-09
Petition DENIED.
2019-11-20
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 12/6/2019.
2019-11-12
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2019-10-30
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due December 2, 2019)

Attorneys

Interior Glass Systems, Inc.
John Patrick McDonnellLaw Offices of John P. McDonnell, Petitioner
John Patrick McDonnellLaw Offices of John P. McDonnell, Petitioner
United States
Noel J. FranciscoSolicitor General, Respondent
Noel J. FranciscoSolicitor General, Respondent