No. 19-5765

Barbara E. Brown v. California Department of Motor Vehicles, et al.

Lower Court: Ninth Circuit
Docketed: 2019-09-03
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
IFP
Tags: circuit-court civil-procedure civil-rights constitutional-rights due-process judicial-bias judicial-disqualification judicial-misconduct legal-proceeding recusal redress standing
Key Terms:
Securities
Latest Conference: 2019-11-01
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit erred

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

QUESTION(S) PRESENTED | 4, Wheher the u.5, cout of Appeals far the Ninth Circuit erred other they agreed with district Court judge Cormac Carney $ decision to NoT dlisqua\iy himsget when asked ts do So after Petitioner was made auare of the many Am pro prieties of Cormac Camey and Wis erroneous decision making. 2. Whether District Court jwlge Cormac Carney erred when he refused to disqualify himselt due to his many Am propriettes and lias agam st Reri toner, 3. Whether the Disteck Coupt Judges Carney and Spayton, the 7" Circuit Pane! of judges and the US, $ . ctrl hen 2 & W-dSupreme Cougt justices * denied Petitioner the Right To Redress, K. Whether the Courts and they Kicees yi ¢ ‘ Constitytional Reh x Violated fPebitroner's be . ™ S) ts (L Amendin ent) Bind +he Tdiciory OF TET under Aricle 3 Section U.S. Constitution,

Docket Entries

2019-11-04
Petition DENIED.
2019-10-17
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 11/1/2019.
2019-08-30
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due October 3, 2019)

Attorneys

Barbara E. Brown
Barbara E. Brown — Petitioner
Barbara E. Brown — Petitioner