No. 19-5767
Virgil Lee Bailey v. United States
Tags: appellate-review criminal-procedure due-process factual-basis guilty-plea harmless-error judicial-standard plain-error plain-error-review plea-bargaining plea-sufficiency sullivan-v-louisiana
Key Terms:
SocialSecurity Securities Immigration
SocialSecurity Securities Immigration
Latest Conference:
2019-10-11
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the sufficiency of a factual basis for a defendant's plea should be subject to plain error review
Question Presented (from Petition)
QUESTIONS PRESENTED I. Whether the sufficiency of a factual basis for a defendant’s plea should be subject to plain error review, or whether, under Sullivan v. Louisiana, 508 U.S. 275 (1993), such a case lacks “an object” upon which review for harmless and plain error may operate? il PARTIES Virgil Lee Bailey is the petitioner; he was the defendant-appellant below. The United States of America is the respondent; it was the plaintiff-appellee below. ili
Docket Entries
2019-10-15
Petition DENIED.
2019-09-19
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/11/2019.
2019-09-13
Waiver of right of respondent United States of America to respond filed.
2019-08-28
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due September 30, 2019)
Attorneys
United States of America
Noel J. Francisco — Solicitor General, Respondent
Noel J. Francisco — Solicitor General, Respondent
Virgil Lee Bailey
Kevin Joel Page — Office of the Federal Public Defender, Petitioner
Kevin Joel Page — Office of the Federal Public Defender, Petitioner