No. 19-5768

Steven Villalona v. Florida

Lower Court: Florida
Docketed: 2019-08-30
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: barker-v-wingo constitutional-law criminal-procedure detainer due-process prisoner-rights rehabilitative-programs sixth-amendment smith-v-hooey speedy-trial
Key Terms:
SocialSecurity Securities Immigration
Latest Conference: 2019-10-18
Question Presented (AI Summary)

What effect, if any, does the filing of a detainer have on a prisoner's right to a speedy trial under the Sixth Amendment?

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

QUESTION(S) PRESENTED (1) What effect, if any, does the filing of a detainer have on a prisoner's right to a speedy trial under the Sixth Amendment? (2) To what degree are the three basic demands .of criminal justice under the Sixth Amendment speedy trial right "aggravated and compounded," in a case of an accused under a state charge who is imprisoned by another jurisdiction? See Smith v. Hooey, 393 U.S. 374 (1969). (3) What effect does an accused's imprisonment by another state have on a Barker v. Wingo, 407 U.S. 514 (1972), speedy trial analysis? (4) Does the filing of a detainer relieve prosecuting officials of the duty, under the Sixth Amendment, to provide an accused with a speedy trial? (5) Does the denial of access to rehabilitative programs constitute oppressive pretrial incarceration in a Barker analysis? (6) What constitutes an assertion of a prisoner's right to a speedy trial under the Sixth Amendment? -i

Docket Entries

2019-10-21
Petition DENIED.
2019-10-03
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/18/2019.
2019-09-30
Waiver of right of respondent Florida to respond filed.
2019-08-26
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due September 30, 2019)

Attorneys

Florida
Celia A. Terenzio — Respondent
Steven Villalona
Steven Justin Villalona — Petitioner