Did the appeals court and district court violate bank's fifth, sixth and fourteenth amendment rights by upholding a sentence that was based on the unconstitutional residual clause

QUESTION(S) PRESENTED , 1) DID THE APPEALS COURT AND DISTRICT COURT VIOLATE BANK'S. FIFTH, SIXTH AND FOURTEENTH AMENDMENT RIGHTS BY UPHOLDING A SENTENCE THAT WAS BASED ON THE UNCONSTITUTIONAL RESIDUAL CLAUSE. JOHNSON V. UNITED STATES, 135 S. Ct. 2551 (2015), See Shepard documents Exhibits (A) and (B) 2) HOW DID THE APPEALS COURT AFFIRM BANKS 28 U.S.C. § 2255 _— MOTION OUTSIDE OF THE STATUTE THAT BANKS WAS CONVICTED : TENN. CODE ANN. 1989 ; . ° . wt , aoe "7 .