No. 19-5771

Eric Allen Haensgen v. United States

Lower Court: Ninth Circuit
Docketed: 2019-08-30
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
Response WaivedIFP Experienced Counsel
Tags: 18-usc-2252a age-of-consent child-pornography constitutional-law criminal-law criminal-statute due-process first-amendment free-speech statutory-interpretation unconstitutional
Key Terms:
FirstAmendment Privacy
Latest Conference: 2019-10-11
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether amendments to the child pornography law set forth in 18 U.S.C. § 2252A(a)(2)(A) have rendered the current version of the statute unconstitutional under the First Amendment

Question Presented (from Petition)

QUESTION PRESENTED Whether amendments to the child pornography law set forth in 18 U.S.C. § 2252A(a)(2)(A) have rendered the current version of the statute unconstitutional under the First Amendment. i STATEMENT OF RELATED CASES * United States v. Eric Allen Haensgen, No. 17CR00204-PA, U.S. District Court for the Central District of California. Judgment entered November 6, 2017. * United States v. Eric Allen Haensgen, No. 17-50392, U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. Judgment entered May 29, 2019. i

Docket Entries

2019-10-15
Petition DENIED.
2019-09-19
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/11/2019.
2019-09-13
Waiver of right of respondent United States of America to respond filed.
2019-08-27
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due September 30, 2019)

Attorneys

Eric Haensgen
Benjamin Lee ColemanColeman & Balogh LLP, Petitioner
Benjamin Lee ColemanColeman & Balogh LLP, Petitioner
United States of America
Noel J. FranciscoSolicitor General, Respondent
Noel J. FranciscoSolicitor General, Respondent