No. 19-5771
Eric Allen Haensgen v. United States
Tags: 18-usc-2252a age-of-consent child-pornography constitutional-law criminal-law criminal-statute due-process first-amendment free-speech statutory-interpretation unconstitutional
Key Terms:
FirstAmendment Privacy
FirstAmendment Privacy
Latest Conference:
2019-10-11
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether amendments to the child pornography law set forth in 18 U.S.C. § 2252A(a)(2)(A) have rendered the current version of the statute unconstitutional under the First Amendment
Question Presented (from Petition)
QUESTION PRESENTED Whether amendments to the child pornography law set forth in 18 U.S.C. § 2252A(a)(2)(A) have rendered the current version of the statute unconstitutional under the First Amendment. i STATEMENT OF RELATED CASES * United States v. Eric Allen Haensgen, No. 17CR00204-PA, U.S. District Court for the Central District of California. Judgment entered November 6, 2017. * United States v. Eric Allen Haensgen, No. 17-50392, U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. Judgment entered May 29, 2019. i
Docket Entries
2019-10-15
Petition DENIED.
2019-09-19
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/11/2019.
2019-09-13
Waiver of right of respondent United States of America to respond filed.
2019-08-27
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due September 30, 2019)
Attorneys
Eric Haensgen
Benjamin Lee Coleman — Coleman & Balogh LLP, Petitioner
Benjamin Lee Coleman — Coleman & Balogh LLP, Petitioner
United States of America
Noel J. Francisco — Solicitor General, Respondent
Noel J. Francisco — Solicitor General, Respondent