No. 19-5779

Eduardo Rodriguez-Lopez v. Florida

Lower Court: Florida
Docketed: 2019-09-03
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
IFP
Tags: constitutional-rights criminal-procedure ineffective-assistance ineffective-assistance-of-counsel plea-colloquy right-to-defense sixth-amendment strickland strickland-standard
Key Terms:
HabeasCorpus
Latest Conference: 2019-11-01
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether the State may rely on a plea colloquy to adequately resolve a claim that counsel failed to advise the defendant of a particular defense, consistent with the Sixth Amendment and Strickland

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

QUESTION PRESENTED FOR REVIEW 1. Consistent with the Sixth Amendment, and this Court’s decisions in Strickland may the State rely on the plea colloquy as to a prisoner acknowledging that he has been advised of all possible defenses and discussed them with counsel to adequately resolve the claim that counsel failed to advise him of his right to a particular defense? 2 PARTIES WHOSE JUDGMENT IS SOUGHT TO BE REVIEWED AND

Docket Entries

2019-11-04
Petition DENIED.
2019-10-17
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 11/1/2019.
2019-07-23
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due October 3, 2019)

Attorneys

Eduardo Rodriguez-Lopez
Eduardo Rodriguez-Lopez — Petitioner
Eduardo Rodriguez-Lopez — Petitioner