No. 19-5780
Marvin Robinson v. Darrel Vannoy, Warden
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: constitutional-law constitutional-rights criminal-procedure due-process fair-trial fourteenth-amendment ineffective-assistance ineffective-assistance-of-counsel sixth-amendment
Key Terms:
DueProcess HabeasCorpus Securities JusticiabilityDoctri
DueProcess HabeasCorpus Securities JusticiabilityDoctri
Latest Conference:
2019-10-11
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether Petitioner's trial counsel was constitutionally ineffective under the Sixth Amendment to the United States Constitution?
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTIONS PRESENTED Whether Petitioner's trial counsel was constitutionally ineffective under the Sixth Amendment to the United States Constitution? and Whether | Petitioner was denied due process of Jaw and a fair trial under the Fourteenth Amendment? | | | | | . | | | | | | | . | | : i | are v
Docket Entries
2019-10-15
Petition DENIED.
2019-09-26
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/11/2019.
2019-09-23
Waiver of right of respondent Darrel Vannoy to respond filed.
2019-08-13
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due October 4, 2019)
Attorneys
Darrel Vannoy
Juliet L. Clark — Assistant District Attorney, Respondent
Juliet L. Clark — Assistant District Attorney, Respondent