Is oppressive pretrial incarceration still an important aspect of the Barker balancing test?

QUESTION(S) PRESENTED ; I) Ls oppressive pretaled Incaccerctida still ay , important pect of the Racker balencih tan Qo Ss eed Tore 7 : y pecey | 2) Ts it accepted practice or Fede-al Judges to Skip over prongs of the Barker analy s/s Wher gndy Inge re Con stitution. Violation of the rly lt toa Speedy Triel ¢ alleged violetione of Const Tirtibnal Riy hts wth ony reviewing them? 4) Has Barker v Wingo loeen over turned So thet Memative sere stesrion of prsyjudive ! n CSSACY { ; Y ) prove a thal of the Const. Ons tite, Fy! right to CA Sp ced) tej ? * (One| , 7 ~ F 4 :