Is oppressive pretrial incarceration still an important part of the Barker balancing test for Speedy Trial?

Of the Barker analysis when judging constitutional violation of the right to a Speedy Trial, is it constitutional for the State court to skip over prongs?

Is it Constitutional for the State court to deny alleged violations of constitutional Rights without reviewing them?

Has Barker v Wingo been over turned so that it is necessary to prove a denial of the Constitutional right to a speedy trial?

Is oppressive pretrial incarceration still an important aspect of the Barker balancing test?