No. 19-5792

Randall Turner v. Tennessee

Lower Court: Tennessee
Docketed: 2019-09-03
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
IFP
Tags: bias-adjudicator capital-adversary-procedures conflict-of-interest due-process equal-protection fifth-amendment fourteenth-amendment sixth-amendment statute-of-limitations structural-defect term-1 term-2 term-3 term-4 term-5 term-6
Key Terms:
DueProcess HabeasCorpus
Latest Conference: 2019-11-01
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether the appellate court appeal process was fundamentally unfair and a denial of due process of law under the Fifth, Sixth and Fourteenth Amendment

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

QUESTION(S) PRESENTED . (1) Whether the appellate court appeal process was fundamentally unfair and a denial of due process of law under the Fifth, Sixth and Fourteenth Amendment (2) ; Whether the petitioner challenge to the State statute of limitation is time bar. Whether the statute of limitation for first degree murder / felony murder is denial of equal protection of law and fundamentally fairness. (4) Whether Counsels concealing the malpractice law suit file on them by there client from the trial court amount to structural defect that requires automatic reversal of convictions. (5) ' Whether Counsels active representing a conflict of interest that deprive there client his Sixth Amendment. : right to be heard at meaningful time and to defend against the prosecution case is structural defect that requires automatic reversal of convictions. (6) Whether , bias adjudicator at critical stage of the Capital adversary process is structural defect that requires automatic reversal of convictions. ; (7) Whether the defendant were expose to “Capital Adversary Procedures” at the pretrial hearing to suppress evidence and identification were “offensive to fundamental principle of justice that requires automatic reversal of convictions. ; i

Docket Entries

2019-11-04
Petition DENIED.
2019-10-17
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 11/1/2019.
2019-06-18
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due October 3, 2019)

Attorneys

Randall Turner
Randall Turner — Petitioner
Randall Turner — Petitioner