Whether Alexander's 18 U.S.C. § 924(c) conviction must be vacated in light of United States v. Davis, 139 S. Ct. 2319 (2019)

QUESTION PRESENTED In United States v. Davis, 139 S. Ct. 2319 (2019), this Court held that the residual clause contained in 18 U.S.C. § 924(c)(3)(b) is unconstitutionally vague. In light of Davis, must Alexander's 18 U.S.C. § 924(c) conviction be vacated, as it relied on, as an underlying crime of violence, bank robbery (18 U.S.C. § 2113)? ii