No. 19-5794
Dazzle Young v. Francisco J. Quintana, Warden
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: criminal-procedure due-process evidence evidence-tampering fifth-amendment fourteenth-amendment sentencing
Key Terms:
DueProcess HabeasCorpus Securities
DueProcess HabeasCorpus Securities
Latest Conference:
2019-10-11
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether Mr. Young's conviction violated due process and his Fifth and Fourteenth Amendment rights due to the use of tampered evidence
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTION(S) PRESENTED . 4 “(q) Could Mr. Young be tried. and convicted by the use of "Tampered" ; evidence in violation of due process and violation of his Fifth and Fourteenth Amendments Rights. : (2) Could Mr. Young be sentenced over the maximum 10 year sentence when he was not sentenced under the Armed Career Criminal Act. : | | (h)
Docket Entries
2019-10-15
Petition DENIED.
2019-09-26
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/11/2019.
2019-09-09
Waiver of right of respondent Quintana, Warden to respond filed.
2019-08-20
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due October 3, 2019)
Attorneys
Dazzle Young
Dazzle Joe Young — Petitioner
Quintana, Warden
Noel J. Francisco — Solicitor General, Respondent