Whether the First Amendment's free speech, free expression, and free association rights were violated when the petitioners were denied the opportunity to present evidence that the underlying conviction was unlawful

QUESTION(S) PRESENTED Tesi tht | ~ Dver Ukbioners gre-hidl dyin os'n ceevance, Soe Aa court odibed, ty evidence ding te ult is inane, use tis Hl aap of Dekker’ Kats bath that sit rout Le depike'ss Mone’ dostratt Vell in wk 6 Knovtn ts ty teil oh "and is qetected gueedn winder thy Fics Henan the United Vales Canctitution. deitioners a Fick Amendment vas OF Tre squech expression, avd ssaclation were vite a ultere Hho Sue Nate or anu evidunce Yuk tae toon was (lovant So Se | tnvcder of Quay Varris. Does this Fick Aner violation wasvant | : Certiorart view? .