Did the federal court render a proper decision or abuse its discretion in the prisoner's case?

QUESTION(S) PRESENTED a )Dict plot have a right 4s Sur while as a poisons for TCRBORS 2 Did Federel cow’ render Fiprclame aly Faure or AispyeTe reset Var deedins prisoners Cause Gancemanins (sues ofi-erthen his . ; Cord tons o& his canfsnemet ? DD innate 43 bowFrclary hat oone cobhiterl rishhas a | . ‘Eoee person © ; DP Rih WSOC a GC) mske crocs tad lected phi foes © curler! psht anh a> 4 result Ae. was opable Lo perv’ he had a pebzapfivolous Ded USDC dinly decide prance S nased ase7 Schulmenk Nefel . b) DA (14Ccr) prewace plewhtP% clots when they proceeded on OF Str : Sectorver 14, 2als face) qo Sher one entered pals Pettices ret . Gilpeadh Aifpred (WA Ge, on. 52 /f Hen Apes portes en danc peber Sy hha re cide tly Was de cde the Sdeme doy 9 00/08 dered ab aloo aie pettfors preyucliced wher they Ad not erat, pid s aston sr c “7 a eek Vapor hea fo bale 2b led She then Lhe Tncly reguasded Withdrawal ape , pursed Fe fed, hp POM |