No. 19-5802
Travis Wade Matthews v. Pennsylvania
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: appellate-review burden-of-proof civil-rights criminal-procedure dna-evidence dna-testing due-process identification jackson-standard jackson-v-virginia mccoy-v-louisiana victim-identification witness-identification
Key Terms:
Privacy
Privacy
Latest Conference:
2019-10-18
Question Presented (AI Summary)
whether-dna-testing-is-client-choice
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTIONS PRESENTED I. _Inacase where the identity of the person who brandished a gun is central to the case, is the choice of whether to ask for DNA testing of the gun, one of the choices reserved to the Appellant : under McCoy v. Louisiana, 138 S.Ct. 1500 (2018) II. Where the victim of a robbery identified the perpetrators of the robbery as two black men and Petitioner is a caucasian who was never identified by the victim as the perpetrator, has the Petitioner stated a claim under Jackson v. Virginia, 443 U.S. 307 (1979) ii LISTS OF PARTIES ; All parties appear in the caption of the case on the cover page.
Docket Entries
2019-10-21
Petition DENIED.
2019-10-03
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/18/2019.
2019-09-16
Waiver of right of respondent Pennsylvania to respond filed.
2019-08-23
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due October 4, 2019)
2019-06-18
Application (18A1329) granted by Justice Alito extending the time to file until August 29, 2019.
2019-06-11
Application (18A1329) to extend the time to file a petition for a writ of certiorari from June 30, 2019 to August 29, 2019, submitted to Justice Alito.
Attorneys
Pennsylvania