Whether the appellate court's reliance on the unconstitutionally vague definition of 'crime of violence' in 18 U.S.C. § 924(c)(3)(B) requires remand for further consideration in light of United States v. Davis

QUESTION PRESENTED In United States v. Davis, 139 S. Ct. 2319 (2019), this Court held that 18 U.S.C. § 924(c)(3)(B), which defines “crime of violence,” is unconstitutionally vague. In affirming Petitioner’s conviction for violating 18 U.S.C. § 924(c), the appellate court relied on the unconstitutionally vague definition in § 924(c)(3)(B). Where the appellate court affirmed Petitioner’s conviction in reliance on the unconstitutional statute, should this case be remanded to the appellate court for further consideration in light of Davis? i INTERESTED PARTIES The are no parties interested in the proceeding other than those named in the caption of the appellate decision. ii