No. 19-5809

Lloyde Dubry v. Kansas

Lower Court: Kansas
Docketed: 2019-09-05
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: appellate-procedure constitutional-rights criminal-history descamps-v-united-states discrimination due-process equal-protection fourteenth-amendment retroactive-application retroactivity sentencing sixth-amendment state-v-wetrich
Key Terms:
DueProcess Privacy
Latest Conference: 2019-11-01
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether the petitioner was denied his remedy by due course of law due to disparate conclusions by Kansas courts on the retroactive application of State v. Wetrich and Descamps v. United States

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

QUESTIONS PRESENTED 1. Whether the petitioner, Lloyde Dubry, was denied his remedy by due course of law -in violation of the Sixth or Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution -because of the disparate conclusions Kansas courts of last resort made concerning whether State v. Wetrich, 307 Kan. 552 (2018), and Descamps v. United States, 570 U.S. 254 (2013), apply retroactively to this petitioner under the circumstances of his case? : 2. Whether the, petitioner, Lloyde Dubry, was denied his remedy by due course of law -in violation of the Sixth or Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution -because of the unlawful discriminatory practices employed against | him during the appellate process by the Kansas courts of last resort? .

Docket Entries

2019-11-04
Petition DENIED.
2019-10-17
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 11/1/2019.
2019-10-09
Waiver of right of respondent Kansas to respond filed.
2019-08-22
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due October 7, 2019)

Attorneys

Kansas
Toby CrouseOffice of Attorney General Derek Schmidt, Respondent
Lloyde Dubry
Lloyde Dubry — Petitioner