No. 19-581
Paul Dovin, et ux. v. Kenneth L. Sweitzer, et al.
Tags: appeals appellate-procedure civil-procedure collateral-order-doctrine collateral-orders collateral-orders-doctrine due-process judicial-review pennsylvania-supreme-court procedural-doctrine right-to-appeal standing
Key Terms:
DueProcess FourthAmendment FifthAmendment Privacy
DueProcess FourthAmendment FifthAmendment Privacy
Latest Conference:
2020-01-10
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the Pennsylvania Supreme Court Erred in Denying Petitioners Right to Appeal Under the Collateral Orders Doctrine?
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTIONS PRESENTED FOR REVIEW Whether the Pennsylvania Supreme Court Erred in Denying Petitioners Right to Appeal Under the Collateral Orders Doctrine?
Docket Entries
2020-01-13
Petition DENIED.
2019-12-19
Reply of petitioners Paul Dovin, et ux. filed. (Distributed)
2019-12-11
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/10/2020.
2019-11-26
Brief of respondents in opposition filed.
2019-10-31
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due December 5, 2019)
Attorneys
Caernarvon Township
Peter James Speaker — Thomas & Thomas, Respondent
Peter James Speaker — Thomas & Thomas, Respondent
Paul Dovin, et ux.
Robert L. Sirianni Jr. — Brownstone, P.A., Petitioner
Robert L. Sirianni Jr. — Brownstone, P.A., Petitioner