No. 19-5812
Mitchum Pastor v. United States
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: 18-usc-2113 bank-robbery crime-of-violence criminal-law criminal-statute elements-clause sentencing-guidelines statutory-interpretation
Key Terms:
SocialSecurity Securities
SocialSecurity Securities
Latest Conference:
2019-10-11
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Does 18 U.S.C. § 2113(a) bank robbery qualify as a 'crime of violence' under U.S.S.G. § 4B1.2(a)(1)'s elements clause?
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTION PRESENTED Because 18 U.S.C. § 2113(a) defines bank robbery in a way that does not require intentional intimidation, does § 2113(a) bank robbery fail to qualify as a “crime of violence” under U.S.S.G. § 4B1.2(a)(1)’s elements clause?
Docket Entries
2019-10-15
Petition DENIED.
2019-09-26
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/11/2019.
2019-09-12
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2019-08-30
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due October 4, 2019)
Attorneys
Mitchum Pastor
Alexander Silvert — Federal Public Defender, Petitioner
Alexander Silvert — Federal Public Defender, Petitioner
United States
Noel J. Francisco — Solicitor General, Respondent
Noel J. Francisco — Solicitor General, Respondent