No. 19-5817

Kendrick Taylor v. Louisiana

Lower Court: Louisiana
Docketed: 2019-09-04
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
Response RequestedResponse WaivedRelisted (2)IFP
Tags: apodaca-v-oregon criminal-procedure criminal-trial fourteenth-amendment incorporation-doctrine johnson-v-louisiana jury-trial jury-unanimity sixth-amendment supreme-court-precedent unanimous-verdict
Key Terms:
DueProcess HabeasCorpus JusticiabilityDoctri
Latest Conference: 2020-01-10 (distributed 2 times)
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether the Sixth Amendment right to a jury trial requires an unanimous jury verdict and, if so, would that unanimity requirement be required in state criminal jury trials via the Fourteenth Amendment

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

QUESTION PRESENTED The issue presented is whether the Sixth Amendment right to a jury trial requires an unanimous jury verdict and, if so, would that unanimity requirement be required in state criminal jury trials via the Fourteenth Amendment. In deciding this question, the Court will be asked to revisit the plurality opinions of Johnson v. Louisiana and Apodaca v. Oregon. i

Docket Entries

2020-01-13
Petition DENIED.
2019-12-19
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/10/2020.
2019-12-05
Brief of respondent State of Louisiana in opposition filed.
2019-11-06
Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including December 9, 2019.
2019-10-31
Motion to extend the time to file a response from November 7, 2019 to December 9, 2019, submitted to The Clerk.
2019-10-08
Response Requested. (Due November 7, 2019)
2019-10-03
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/18/2019.
2019-09-30
Waiver of right of respondent State of Louisiana to respond filed.
2019-08-30
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due October 4, 2019)

Attorneys

Kendrick Taylor
Andre Robert BelangerManasseh, Gill, Knipe & Belanger, Petitioner
State of Louisiana
Michelle Ward GhettiAttorney General, State of Louisiana, Respondent
Elizabeth Baker MurrillOffice of the Attorney General, Respondent