No. 19-5830

William H. Danielson v. New York

Lower Court: New York
Docketed: 2019-09-05
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: appeal-waiver civil-rights criminal-procedure due-process guilty-plea judicial-misconduct prosecutorial-misconduct regulatory-authority standing waiver-of-appeal
Key Terms:
DueProcess
Latest Conference: 2019-11-01
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Should judicial misconduct survive a waiver of appeal and guilty plea?

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

QUESTION(S) PRESENTED 1) Should judicial misconduct survive a waiver of appeal and guilty plea? 2) Should prosecutorial misconduct survive a waiver of appeal and guilty plea? . 3) Should decisions of The Commission on Judicial Conduct, and other such regulatory authorities be explained when they are dismissed? ("The decisions of the Commission must stand by themselves and cannot be expounded upon..." Words to this . effect were stated, when I requested to know why perjuries by a judge were deemed insufficient to warrant discipline.) 4) Should civil cases resulting from criminal cases be left unadjudged until appeals of the criminal case are exhausted? 5) Should violations of civil rights have a statute of limitations commensurate with other crimes, of 7 years, if not longer in cases where — these were deliberately denied by those in positions of authority? Page 2 :

Docket Entries

2019-11-04
Petition DENIED.
2019-10-10
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 11/1/2019.
2019-09-24
Waiver of right of respondent New York to respond filed.
2019-08-21
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due October 7, 2019)

Attorneys

New York
Lauren D. KonsulNew York Prosecutors Training Institute, Inc., Respondent
Lauren D. KonsulNew York Prosecutors Training Institute, Inc., Respondent
William Danielson
William Danielson — Petitioner
William Danielson — Petitioner